![]() ![]() Meeting the Kremlin partway would defuse today’s most militarized issue and avoid a nuclear arms buildup on both sides. Moscow says it will respond with new nuclear weapons. The Obama administration has repeatedly refused on both counts. senators 'monsters' and accusing America of targeting missile defense at Russia. ![]() Moscow has demanded at least minimal participation in the European system or, failing that, a written guarantee that it will never be directed against Russia. The program is enormously expensive, plagued by technical problems and needlessly provocative. This argument builds upon those presented in more depth in an earlier co-written. Formally, they are a precaution against a future Iranian threat, but Moscow fears that the installations will eventually jeopardize its nuclear security. Most controversially, Kuzmarov accuses Obama of triggering a new cold war between Russia and the United States. Discarding “selective cooperation” for real negotiations should begin with the missile-defense installations that Washington and Brussels are deploying near Russia. Bush’s further expansion of NATO and withdrawal from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. war in Afghanistan in 2001 was later rewarded by President George W. ![]() Putin has never forgotten that his vital assistance to the U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |